Yes, we have herbicide

If there was ever an indication that restoring natural areas is really horticulture, this is it. Even an artisanal project like ours would never be able to keep up with noxious weed growth and re-growth without a certain amount of pesticide application.

There is a difference between widely broadcasting pesticides that kill a lot of organisms and applying a small amount to a specific target at the right time in its life cycle. This is the time that my current target – scotch broom – is most vulnerable. And if there is poison oak adjacent, well, I might spend some time on that.

The two herbicides I use – glyphosate on(ingredient in Roundup®) and triclopyr (Garlon®) are the least toxic to me, and the assortment of creatures they’re likely to contact. (I prefer to use the ester formulation of Garlon because it is less poisonous to me, the applicator, than the amine). I occasionally use Poast®, an herbicide that kills grass but not broadleaf weeds.

Restorationists rely on spraying weeds to get native plants established. But they also are looking out for some of the organisms that can be damaged by overzealous use of chemicals. There is a growing conservation biology literature, for example, on pesticide effects on rare and endangered butterflies and their larvae.

Anyway, there are other ways to work on the weeds. One hand-weeding method developed by Joan Bradley and her sister relied on minimal disturbance, slow clearing, and fostering natural regeneration by working from the best, most intact areas outward. This method has a lot to recommend it. It requires discipline to not clear out all the weeds in the worst areas. It requires patience. But the good thing is, it doesn’t take a lot of intensive work – the two authors regenerated 40 acres in a public park in Australia by working just a few hours at a time.

I still aspire to mastering that technique. Meanwhile, the hybrid method of following machine-clearing with hand work, mowing, and spraying will have to do. I’m off to climb the hill with my 40 pounds of solution – 24 in the backpack sprayer, carrying a jug with the rest. Saves on the gym membership.

Scotch broom showing the effects of recent Garlon 3A application

P.S. Scotch broom flowers make a pretty good yarn dye. I experiment with the many I haven’t killed yet.

2 thoughts on “Yes, we have herbicide

  1. Thank you for sharing your experiences.
    Yes, we also use some herbicide. Mainly for Madera Vine which we are removing from the private backyards that form the Fox Gully wildlife corridor.
    Our great non-poison weapon is the Treepopper which clamps around the base of woody weeds and simply uproots the whole plant. The ground needs to have been softened by rain first but very fast and effective.
    I will watch you progress with interest. I love your rain beetle story.
    Michael Fox

    Like

    • I have a device called a weed wrench – sounds similar to your Treepopper. I use it rarely, as it tends to disturb the soil and bring up the incredibly numerous, very long-lived scotch broom seedbank. But it does come in handy sometimes. I have two sizes – as you say, when the soil is wet (winter here) it works very well.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s